Life After Patch: Former Editors Start Their Own Hyperlocal Sites
March 10, 2014

In the last several years, hundreds of journalists took a risk and went to work for a big company that said it could deliver hyperlocal news online across the country.

That company was Patch.

Today, many of the jobs it once offered are gone.

But what it left behind was a group of highly trained digital editors, a handful of them with aspirations higher than moving on to another media company on shaky ground.

These editors have left Patch and started their own local news ventures, or joined a fresh crop of hyperlocal startups started by others in communities around the country.

Determined to learn from the mistakes made by Patch, they are doing local news on their own terms.

As they tell it, this means no more directives from an office in New York City about how to cover local news in small towns in Connecticut.

And no more requirements to publish nationally-focused stories on vacations or Olympic athletes to fulfill a company sponsorship contract. 

This is a story about a new class of hyperlocal news entrepreneurs and their shot at doing community journalism online and doing it right. 

And what is right?

Former Patch local editor Tran Longmoore, founder of The Saline Post in Michigan,  says it best:

“Religiously local.”

Patch Media, AOL and Hale Global did not respond to email and phone requests for comment.

 A Gamble on Hyperlocal

In 2007, Tim Armstrong came up with the idea for Patch after he failed to find any information about his hometown, Riverside, Conn., online.

Two years later, not long after Armstrong became CEO of AOL, the company acquired Patch for $7 million.

For several years, the gamble looked as if it might pay off.

At its peak, Patch, with its company headquarters in New York, employed more than 1,000 journalists working on 900 sites across the country.

Then, the layoffs started.

In August of 2013, Patch laid off 40 percent of its workforce and cut a third of its sites, but Armstrong vowed that the struggling company would be successful.

Instead, AOL sold majority ownership of Patch to holding company Hale Global in January.

Then, more layoffs.

Patch local editor Karen Goff watched as the Patch she knew was sinking.

“I knew that it might be the beginning of the end,” she said.

But for Goff and several other former Patch editors, that just meant a new beginning. 

“I know what people want to read.”

Goff looked for new opportunities. A meeting with Scott Brodbeck, the founder and editor of ARLnow, a hyperlocal site for Arlington, Va., gave her the out she needed.

“I’m not a good business person,” Goff said.

Brodbeck said she could have editorial control over her own site in Reston, Va., and he would handle ad sales and revenue, according to Goff.

Advertising from local businesses, such as an area theatre and apartment building, fund the site. Prices range from $100 for a week of coupons to $1,500 for a week-long purchase of all the site’s advertising space, with a number of options in between.

Goff launched on Oct. 28 and said she’s already amassed a reader base three-quarters of the size of her Patch readership, with 32,000 unique visitors per month. “I think people followed me to the site because they liked what I was doing, not necessarily what Patch was doing,” she said.

At RestonNow, Goff has devoted herself to covering civic issues, such as the local government and business community. A particularly snowy winter for the region has given Goff news to cover regarding schools, including local schoolchildren having to walk in the streets due to unplowed sidewalks.

Screenshot from

Screenshot from

Goff keeps her coverage local, in a way that she said she couldn’t at Patch.

In particular, Goff found upper level management’s insistence that Patch attempt to localize national stories “disheartening.”

“The people [working] in the communities knew what their people wanted, and that wasn’t always what the people in New York were telling us to do,” she said.

Patch had a tendency to focus on feature pieces, something Goff said she is determined to avoid.

“I know what people want to read,” she said. “It’s what’s opening, what’s closing, what decisions are being made that are going to affect me, and where traffic is going to be.”

‘Tone Deaf’

Even former high-level editors at Patch acknowledged the company’s goals were lofty.

“I can’t imagine designing a local news coverage system,” said Mike Dinan, a former Patch senior regional editor in New Canaan, Conn. “Local is so nuanced that it’s hard to get one town right with [a national] editorial coverage plan.”

Dinan was one of hundreds laid off in January. Two days later, he was back to work — this time on his own site,,with his brother, Terry.

The site gives a broad view of the town, with both serious police news and lighter fare. On a recent day, Dinan posted about a dog defecation problem in a local cemetery and an underage drinking party recently busted up by police.

He tells the story of New Canaan in many different ways, including mini-profiles on town residents and, interestingly, the community’s canines.

Screenshot from

Screenshot from

Dinan emphasizes that this is a site for users with strong ties to New Canaan. That local sensibility is the primary difference between what he is doing now versus what Patch expected of him.

For example, he cites the lack of county governments in Connecticut as a sticking point in scaling local stories.

Whereas a story about a county health department policy may be equally pertinent to ten different towns in a single county in New York, the same cannot be said for Connecticut, where municipal services are rarely shared between towns.

A thorough understanding of the town’s mindset is equally important to Dinan.

New Canaan, which is in Connecticut’s panhandle, is 20 miles closer to New York City than Hartford.

“We are part of the state of Connecticut here, but our taste for regional news rarely turns to the governor or state legislature,” he said.

If Patch chose to publish a story about a bill in the Connecticut General Assembly on its Connecticut sites, it would seem like an efficient choice from afar, but would not be well-received, Dinan said.

“Chances are you’re coming across as tone-deaf down this way, for the most part,” Dinan said.

Standards of Success

Many former Patch editors who started their own websites said they rely on local advertising to power their new ventures. Some also said they are seeking revenue from individual donations.

This is precisely where Patch stumbled: its ability to grab local advertisers, said news industry analyst Ken Doctor.

And that was a problem for a company that emphasized hyperlocal, even with its ability to tap AOL’s massive advertising base for support, Doctor said.

Patch also struggled to meet its own standard of success, which varies greatly from that of an independent site, according to Doctor.

“Patch was built on the notion that you could scale a business ploy on hyperlocal news and that you could build an increasingly profitable system,” he said.

On the other hand, an independent site often only needs enough revenue to fund regular salaries for one or two employees, Doctor explained.

While the standard for success may be lower, the workload for many former Patchers is higher.

“At Patch, it seemed like so much work just for content,” said Doug Miner, a former local editor for several Patch sites in the St. Louis area who started his own hyperlocal site called 40 South News. “Now it’s the content plus ads.”

Even with the added money worries, these journalists spoke optimistically about their futures.

Bill Bittar started All About Monroe in February after being laid off from his job as a local editor in Monroe, Conn. in January. 

“[It’s exciting] to see how so many ex-Patchers’ love of journalism is so strong that they started their own news sites,”he said. “Independent sites seem to be the future of online journalism and I hope most, if not all, survive and thrive.”

  • Sean Henderson


  • Jeff A. Taylor

    I really hope some of the metro ATL Patchers boot-strap something. The region is so large and split into so many jurisdictions that the new “compressed” Patch is a fly-by at best, no where near hyperlocal.

  • Bob Stepno

    I lived in Connecticut for more than 30 years and was a reporter for a third of that time.

    While the state has no county governments, it does have formal and informal regions that cross town and city lines, sometimes similar to the old county geography — regional planning districts, court districts, state house and senate districts, congressional districts, environmental regions (e.g., watersheds), some regional high school districts, state police barracks, areas surrounding individual community college and state colleges, areas served by particular hospitals, etc.

    Going too “hyperlocal” risks neglecting those agencies and issues of regional importance. Is anyone building a “patchy” state network (or news service) with regional hubs and a statehouse staff? The state seems the right size for that kind of experiment.

  • lonseidman

    For any former Patch editors, the Independent Media Network is here to help. We are a social enterprise that is helping professional journalists launch their own sites. We don’t charge anything to get you up and running and if we can cluster enough sites together in a geographic region we can even help with sales and the business side of the operation on a revenue sharing model. Even if we can’t help with revenue we are happy to host you for free to get you up and running. We are driven by our social mission first, profits second.

    You can read more about what we do at the Nieman Journalism Lab that did a nice summary of our operation here in Connecticut:

    More information on the network is here:

  • TheNate

    Patch had a great idea, but the execution was too top-heavy. They should have fired the MBA sycophants at the main office and given editors both more autonomy and a budget for stringers and freelancers. Instead, the people who actually made the best products they could got fired and the upper management who really screwed it all up get bonuses.

    • Dante

      Patch stories destroyed people in NJ. Some of those community towns wrote crap and they used it as a way to defame people because the dirty politicians needed a media vehicle and patch was it. To date, these stories are still online haunting these people and dirty patch editors like Tom Davis refuse to remove them.

      • Tom Davis

        Excuse you want to take this down, because this is slander?

  • insider

    Patch is under a federal investigation. It’s politically corrupt journalism.
    Kickbacks and bribes for misleading and inaccurate journalism.

    Wicked and evil political bosses write horrific arrest stories that were used to RUIN lives. This is why PATCH I’d Cursed. They pick and lactose what they remove handbrake negative stories up to hurt people.

    No good will come to Patch. It’s a cursed site that will drain any one who tries to jeep it going and who is keeping these dirty inaccurate slanderous stories online that have destroyed lives.

    Patch will dry up every penny and is Cursed. It will destroy the person who keeps it up and running. It destroyed Tim Armstrong. LLC s will lose National papers and face lawsuits.

    Your done if patch stays around

    Yabotushebalato Ilseinryub latency
    It’s Cursed

  • insider

    Those who donate and invest will be cursed

  • Mary Elizabeth Barr Mann

    Carolyn Maynard-Parisi and I (two ex-Patchers) are in “soft-launch” with The Village Green, covering Maplewood and South Orange. Please give it a look:

  • RYDE

    without Patch, which I really liked, can anyone recommend a similar outlet for the Raleigh Durham area? We have some music and sports events to announce and I have not found anything similar. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

  • Larry

    My humble opinion of is they lack journalism ethics and integrity. Patch is back, but it is destined to fail again. Patch has been the recipient of numerous complaints at the Better Business Bureau and maintains an F rating by the consumer protection organization. In late 2016, Patch and Hale Global were sued for unlawfully accessing and publishing information from internal police documents, publishing false and libelous statements, provoking hatred, religious discrimination, anti-Semitism, carelessly
    endangering alleged witnesses, and revealing alleged witness names. For more information on this, please see case Jonathan Reich v. Charles C. Hale, Hale Global, Patch Media et al. Index number 156787/2016 at New York County Supreme Court.

    Steps To Access The Lawsuit–
    Jonathan Reich v. Charles C. Hale & Patch

    New York County Supreme Court – Index No. 156787/2016

    1) Go to:

    2) Click on: “Create an account”

    3) Click on: “Search as Guest”

    4) Enter the numbers and letters in the captcha on the

    5) Enter the following into the ‘Case Number’ field:
    “156787/2016” & Search

    6) Click on the link labeled “156787/2016” to view the
    case documents